(Mitch McConnell's) Cold words about Enron's victims
by Betty
Baye
There's not much good to commend about being forced to spend three and four hours at a time in airports waiting for flights. Airport food and snacks are way overpriced and there's always that important businessman who has to into his cellphone so that everyone around him can know that he's an important businessman.
But if you love to read, but rarely have huge blocs of time to do nothing but, the hours spent in airports these days, thanks to Osma bin Laden's Terror Inc., can be made just a bit more bearable.
And last weekend, I had plenty of time to read when I flew to Virginia to deliver a speech commemorating the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday. Of my total 38-hour journey, 10 hours were spent lumbering through security, standing on line to get a seat and waiting for my flight.
The New York Times, Washington Post, Newsweek and USA Today had
my almost full attention.
They hit the story of Enron's collapse from every angle. They
covered it as a political drama -- who
in the White House knew what when -- as a business story --
with a lot less fanfare than Enron
employees, the $60,000 and under crowd at Lucent, General Electric,
McDonald's and Coca-Cola
have also seen the value of their company stocks fall by more
than 20 percent, puttig their futures at
risk -- and as a human interest story given that 15,000 Enron
workers have lost $1.3 billion in their
company's 401(k) plan.
And those Enron worker lost while the big dogs at Enron, with
the benefit of insider knowledge that
the company was near collapse, made millions unloading their
fat stock portfolios before the fall and
even as the little guys and gals were be assured Enron's future
was rosy.
When I was reading about one Enron family's plans to sell land
that has been in the husband's family
for generations, I thought about how calloused Sen. Mitch McConnell
seemed in a radio interview a
few days earlier.
Enron workers, he said, had only themselves to blame.
They were foolish not to have diversified their investment portfolios, McConnell said.
In other words, they were foolish to trust their bosses.
What made McConnell's comments incredulous is that he's a big
man in the party that everyone
knows loves corporations better than pigs than slop. The GOP
loves to say that it's mission is to get
government off the backs of corporations because presumably,
left to their own devices, the
corporations will do right by the environment and their workers.
Add to that the fact that McConnell's party is the one that thinks
it would be a swell idea for
workers to swell their retirement nest eggs by investing in
the stock market instead of good, old, safe
Social Security.
McConnell acknowledged that he's gotten money from Enron over
the years, but not much he
assured his listening constituents. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchinson,
McConnell's GOP colleague who
hails from Texas where Enron is based in Houston, said she's
giving back Enron's contribution to
help workers who've taken bath in Enron's collapse.
That's good for her, McConnell said, but he's not giving anything back.
He might were he a Texan. But since he's a Kentuckian, oh well.
I wonder what all those good Republican Enron employees would
think of McConnell's view of
them as simpletons and of him running the official Republican
line these days, the truth of which will
be proven one way or another, that Enron got nothing for the
millions it lavished on politicians over
the years, including Democrats.
I bet that those good Republican Enron workers would have expected
something a bit more
sympathetic or that the GOP would take as good care of them
as it took of their bosses.
Instead, the White House and assorted other political Enron beneficiaries
are running for cover.
Some, like McConnell, are even blaming the victims of corporate
excess and greed.
Enron got nothing for the millions it lavished on politicians, McConnell said.
Pleeeeze. That statement is an insult to everyone's intelligence.
Enron got a lot. It bought access to the powerbrokers and in
return for a place on Enron's corporate
breast, the powerbrokers slathered Enron with favorable legislation
and loopholes that made it
possible for Enron executives and the companies jivetime auditors
to exploit loopholes like the ones
that made it possible for Enron to make billions at one time,
but pay zero in taxes.
And to think, some of the same people in Congress who were all
hot and bothered about consensual
sex, or whatever that was between President Clinton and Monica
Lewinsky, now sit perfectly
sanguine when one of its corporate benefactors has, in effect,
and with no consent screwed its
workers and other investors, who've lost $60 billion in the
collapse.
Betty Winston Bayé's column appears Thursdays
in The Forum.
Copyright 2002 The Courier-Journal.